It appeared logical to suppose that they are usually in mm, but the z . values displayed can not possibly be correct if they are indeed in mm.Im assuming that there can be some alteration heading on, perhaps getting to do with optical coordinates and products, but I cant body it out from the records.
The documents only speaks of pixels, ánd my linear aIgebra is usually too weak to recognize whats heading on. Camera Calibration Toolbox Matlab How To Associate ThisI do think it could end up being pixels - -pixel size is definitely constant and motivated by a camcorders sensor, right Not certain however how to associate this to ranges though. My z . value is 990, and Ive got 5.5 microns per pixel in the sensor. By my computations, that changes to z . 5.4cmeters, which is usually too near. For all purposes a camera generates a picture that offers no significant units. ![]() You can re put in a level by getting 2 monitored factors and measuring the length between those factors. Right now if you know the genuine distance between these points you can obtain a conversion factor. So a perfect 1:100 imitation is certainly no different for the soIver than the true deal. So you must allays bring up to something you can calculate individually for each calculating session. ![]() I arrived to the exact same summary, and Sick be taking some more images with an object of known dimensions. The strange thing will be that the supplied triangulation function accurately determines the range between factors in my images. Regrettably, there appears to become a range aspect thats off (I think its focal lengthdistance ). Making claims structured on viewpoint; back them up with work references or individual experience. Not really the answer youre searching for Browse other questions tagged matlab 3d camcorder camera-calibration or request your own query.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |